Posts archive for: June, 2007
  • Honour?? Killings

    Banaz Mahmod is the latest in a depressing line of ‘honour’ killings whereby young Muslim women are murdered by their family to preserve the so called family honour. It is closely linked to forced marriage and officially there are 12-15 killings a year. However everyone admits that this is a false figure because many more young women are forced to commit suicide (young Muslim women have 3X the suicide rate of the rest of the population), disappear but are not reported, or are sent back to the ‘Homeland’ where they disappear. Given women’s rights in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Kurdistan etc the murders will not attract any interest from authorities.

    Killing is also just the tip of the iceberg in terms of the pressures put upon young Muslim women to conform to the family demands of ‘Honour’. Beatings are common, imprisonment, the threat of alienation from the family and community and a very common practice of taking them ‘On holiday’ to visit relatives where they are then forced to marry someone against their wishes or left. A survey in Bradford a few years ago of Muslim children’s progress threw up a result that no one anticipated. This was the disappearance of huge number of Muslim girls by the age of 16. No one is suggesting that they had been murdered (who knows) but the only conclusion the report could come to was that they had been sent away to get married. The number of boys at 16 was consistent with the numbers enrolled at school but there had been a 10% unaccounted for loss of girls of the same age.

    Amazingly Muslim mothers participate in the barbaric treatment of their daughters and in Banaz Mahmod’s case; it was her mother who lied to her about her safety that persuaded her to return home to her death. The Kurdish community then conspired to get rid of evidence and hamper the police investigation and Banaz’s sister has had to go into hiding to protect herself from the wrath of the community after being the main force behind the police investigation.

    It is beyond the average liberal western mind to understand why Muslim parents, brothers and uncles would kill/torture their own female family members and force them into marriage out of some barbaric ‘Honour’ code. But it is important that we try to understand, if we are to reduce the terrible treatment metered out to Muslim women, guilty of not wanting to be forced into a marriage or even worse (in many male Muslim eyes) of being seen talking to a man who was not of their immediate family. So let’s look at Benaz’s sad life and try to work out why her family killed her and why her mother and the general Kurdish community colluded in it.

    Banaz like many Muslim women had an arranged (forced) marriage to someone much older than her. She was beaten repeatedly and left him. She then returned home where she was told she had ‘Shamed her family’. The family was particularly sensitive to shame because Banaz’s sister Bekhal had been taken into care by the authorities after a catalogue of physical abuse by her father. Banaz then literally signed her own death warrant by becoming a girlfriend of a Kurdish man from another tribe who was a family friend.

    Her father and his brother tried to kidnap the boyfriend but he was protected by his friends. Benaz had gone to the police to ask for protection but was persuaded by her mother to come home as ‘She would be safe’ and not go to a refuge. The next day she was killed and her body put in a suitcase and buried.

    Crucially in this case Benaz had come forward to the police and they had evidence from the boyfriend and her sister. The community itself closed in and tried to prevent the police investigation. The police were also hampered because of PC which means that their every action in relation to Muslims is tempered by the fear of being called racists or even worse Islamaphobic. They thus sadly (but understandably) leave the community to police itself in a way they would never do if it was a young white women being mistreated. Eventually they succeed and the father and uncle were imprisoned along with 2 other men who participated. A number of other men have however fled to Kurdistan after being helped to escape by the Kurdish community (the irony is that the family were accepted as political refugees from Iraq).

    So what lessons can be learned?

    1) Police must investigate all indications of abuse of Muslim women by family members with the utmost rigour and there must be safe houses where they can be moved to. The presumption should be the women is telling the truth and there is an immediate threat.
    2) School teachers should be given training on the signs to look out for in terms of abuse as they are one of the few institutions that have access to Muslim women without their fathers being in control.
    3) An education campaign must be undertaken by the Muslim leaders to stress that women are equal and must not be abused (it would be great if the unelected MCB did something useful like this for a change)
    4) All Muslim refugees/asylum seekers and new immigrants must be instructed in terms of basic civilised values in the treatment of women. They should sign a code of conduct that stipulates their acceptance of basic human values and the men’s right to remain in the country should be affected by any mistreatment of women.
    5) A law banning forced marriages must be passed (a bill was rejected last year because the government did not want to alienate Muslim leaders).

    Of course little of this will happen because the government is prepared to sacrifice Muslim women on the alter of PC in order to avoid being called Islamaphobic. This Guardianiata approach can be summed up by the Guardian Newspaper reporting which stressed the police’s fault and had no condemnation of Islamic values in relation to women, the Kurdish community or even the Mother (who has not been charged).

    Could any of the Islamists on this site tell me why so many male Muslims hate women so much and treat them so badly?

  • Africa and the Failue of Aid (sorry St Bob)

    Many moons ago I did a politics degree and one of the units I most enjoyed was development studies. I was taken by the various theories of under development and believed (as did the vast majority of students) that all of the third worlds problems (LDCs) were due to the actions of the terrible exploitive developed world. This is of course the same misguide view that Guadianistas still hold.

    Time, travel and of course observing what is really happening in the world has shown me that the lack of development (or positive reversal) in most of Africa is not caused by the malicious actions of the wicked West taking all of Africa’s resources and robbing them blind. In reality the West has furnished untold billions in aid but instead of making the situation better it has made it worse by encouraging dependency and facilitating corruption and patronage by the power elites. Africa has had many times more money in aid (in real terms) than Europe had from America after the 2ndWW in the Marshal Plan and aid continues to pour in. Yet the continent is in the main going backwards in development terms.

    A new book by Paul Collier explains it really well; it starts with the positive news on development (it’s going really well on a global scale despite what Saint Bob says) with a drop from 40% of the world population being in absolute poverty in 1981 to less than 20% now. However there is a hard core 1b people living in about 50 failing states that are literally going backwards and the bulk of these are in Sub Saharan Africa. In 1981 10% of the worlds poor were in SSA, it is now 50% and rising and the area has 2/3 of all the world’s aid cases.

    The reasons are varied for the abject failure, over dependence on a few natural resources, poor governance, wars etc etc. However the biggest problem is Corruption and he quotes the World Bank report that African Elite hold $700bn-$800bn outside the continent and every year $150bn leaves in illicit capital flight. This is far more than the total aid sums and “Corruption cuts tax revenues by at least half”. If good governance could be achieved there could be anything up to a 3 fold increase in GDP and aid would largely be made irrelevant.

    The problem is of course that it is impossible to achieve good governance by exhortation or worthy reports. No Western Government will interfere militarily (imagine the Guardianista response and post Iraq NO ONE wants to know) and the answer from Africa’s Political elite to any complaints from the Aid Donors re corruption is to shout racism and imperialism.

    Thus the situation will get worse and more illegal immigrants will flood into Europe. Civil strife in Africa will increase and absolute poverty will rise. The West will pour in more aid which will primarily help Swiss Banks and luxury goods manufacturers (without Western Aid would Mercedes Benz go Bankrupt?).

    Has anyone got any answers??????????????????????

  • News Snippets

    Snippets of news from the Broadsheets

    Here are some of the lesser known items from the broadsheets that I found interesting:

    • There has been a 55% increase in crimes by under 16s on London buses which coincides exactly with Ken Livingstones free bus pass for under 16s. As someone who frequently uses London buses wherever possible I avoid them from 15.15-16.15 as they can be hell.

    • A Birmingham ‘Well Being Workshop’ has received a grant to pay for taking families from immigrant communities to stately homes and other buildings of historical significance. I think this is a good idea BUT statistically white working class visit historical buildings even less than immigrant communities and there is no such a scheme for them? Why

    • The official crime figures are fairly meaningless because few people report minor crimes if there is no insurance claim involved. Thus increasing weight is give to the annual crime survey which asks people for their experience. This is then used by the government to tell us that crime is falling. HOWEVER it does not survey under 16s who cause a high proportion of street crime. Now why do we not believe government messages?

    • Oona King (the black MP who lost seat to Gorgeous George in part because her mother was Jewish) is not known as an avowed racist but has written

    “I used to believe that housing allocation should only be done on the basis of need, but anyone who was born or brought up in Britain is never going to have the level of housing need as someone who has just arrived”. “How do you get a cohesive community if you’ve got this churn of people coming in, and others who have been here for generations having to move out”.

    If this was said by anyone who was not from a BME community it would be condemned as racism and not the common sense that it is. ?? Why has Margaret Hodge (a despicable women usually) been condemned as racist for saying exactly the same thing.

  • Best Blog from Steph

    For those who do not know Steph is (claimed) a women who is an extreme anti semite, supports suicide bombings in Israel, says all Jews are really Russian and should be sent back and that everyone should live in their ethnic area e.g. only black people should live in Africa etc. Her/his political rants are normally well written and when viewed with a little distance hilarious i.e. all western democracy is a sham, only Iran has a real democracy, everyone who disagrees with her/him is a Islamist fascist, feminist, imperialist US stooge etc etc eg “I've been the target of several bullying campaigns by cybernazi trolls (mainly Zionists and Feminists)”

    The latest rant is about the Child Support Agency which he/she thinks is a fascist, imperialist, Jewish plot (presumably sponsored by the CIA) against men.
    I quote

    “The whole concept of the CSA is fascist, the state interfering in family life and deciding how much money a parent should pay another parent for the upkeep of their child. Frankly this is something that should be left to parents as part of a voluntary arrangement. It's none of the States business - or wouldn't be in a liberal democracy!

    “Why should there be any presumption that a parent who doesn't choose to be a parent should pay anything to the parent who had his child? Mother's can abrogate their responsibilities by terminating their child or placing them up for adoption, why shouldn't men have the right to abrogate their responsibilities too? “

    “The policy of forcing parents (normally mothers) who claim benefits to apply for Child Support is state enforced whoredom”

    Sure sounds like a liberal western women to me. Of course it is terrible that society should expect the father to have a duty to pay for the child he was an equal part in creating. The women should be forced to have an abortion?

    This is Stephs world but it all pales behind the FALSE FLAG ENTRY here are some extracts

    “I maintain that Africa is Black and yes, following on that principle I'd say that Europe is white” (in the context of where people should be returned to ie it was backing up her/his statement that all Jews are really Russian and should be returned to Russia)

    "We should cut off all diplomatic, political and economic links. List Zionism as a racist ideology and refuse to recognise dual nationality with Israel. And arrest every Israeli war criminal who sets foot on European soil." (this means every Israeli citizen as her definition is that they are all war criminals by living in Israel)

    “These European Jewish gangsters, terrorists and religious fanatics murdered, raped, tortured and tried to completely ethnically cleanse the indigenous Palestinian population to make way for their very European, Jewish Fascist State, with the assistance of the British government.”

    "It's all very well talking about Israeli civilians, but every Israeli adult is a militant."

    "There is a very clear good versus evil situation. The creation of Israel was a crime against humanity - an act of pure evil."

    "Israel was formed by Holocaust survivors it was formed by terrorists, fascists and gangsters." (all Holocaust survivors who went to Israel were Fascist??)

    “The Palestinians don't deliberately target children, Israel does. Blowing up a disco or bar is targeting people of military age, who have either served in the military occupation or are eligible to - legitimate targets.”

    (on bombings) “As long as it isn't deliberately aimed at a child and is carried out to end the Occupation - yes I do! I also think the same about all attacks on Occupation forces in Iraq and Afghanistan - they are morally justified”. Hmm a UK citizen who supports the killing of UK service personnel????????????

    “The only democracy in the Middle East is Iran, all the groups claiming to support democratic reform in Iran are thoroughly undemocratic, monarchists, Zionists, secular fascists and a fanatical terrorist cult, who makes the Nazis looks good. Iran is an Islamic democracy like America is a secular democracy, only constitutional Iran's model is more democratic.

    “I'd happily see Turkey become an Islamic republic, it's better than a secular fascist state run by a military junta.

    “The Guardian is fanatically anti Iranian and notoriously dishonest on the Middle East. I know you think it's left wing paper but really it's not. I don't believe the Guardian is worth reading. I'm sick of the blatant New Labour and Zionist propaganda and bold face lies. (and here was me thinking the Guardian was left wing, anti Israel and left wing)

    “Ahmadinejad is the most philosophical and intellectual president in the World today, he compete with Chavez and Castro as a left wing visionary.

    “I see nothing morally wrong with Arabs forced to live under the Saudi regime, assassinating one of the Saudi royal family.

    “Many of our Western traditions are really learned off the Muslims, even democracy. (I thought demos was a Greek word?)

    “(There is not) any evidence that al-Qaeda was involved in 911. As far as I can see al-Qaeda is an America invention,

  • The best blog on here?

    Best Blog
    The most illuminating and (as long as you look at it in the right way) funny blog has to be Stephs FALSE FLAG. The blog itself is the usual Anti American Anti UK Anti Western Islamist rant but it is the comments that follow that make it truly brilliant.

    Before reading the comments I did not know that

    1) All Jews in Israel are really Russian and should be sent back to Russia
    2) That the concentration camp survivors from Europe who set up Israel were Fascists, Imperialist, Criminal Terrorists
    3) That everyone should go back to their ethnic homeland e.g. all blacks to Africa etc
    4) That it is ok to kill Israeli women and children because they are Zionist
    5) That Israel targets Palestinian children but Palestinians only target Israeli military targets
    6) That Iran is the most perfect democracy (presumably not if you are a women, gay, liberal, a Christian a Sunni etc etc)
    7) That every bad thing in the world is a Western Imperialist plot
    8) That the Taliban is very popular in Afghanistan and are a beacon of light

    It truly is great fun to read and will either confirm your views that the world has gone crazy or at the very least entertain you. Of course Steph also believes we have no free speech in the West (see other blogs) and thus she will I guess soon have the knock on the door as we are a ‘Fascist State’. It is amusing that the most fervent Islamists always have addresses in Europe and yet hate us so much?

    Why not go and live in an Islamic state if it is so much freer and open than the fascist west??????????????????????????????????????????

  • Judge a People (Country) by its Foes

    Using the adage my enemies enemy is my friend, then perhaps there is mileage in judging a country or a people by its enemies. The logic being if you hate the enemies then the country or people cannot be all wrong.
    Israel and the Jews are hated by the extreme left, the extreme right, Islamists and the Guardianista Liberal Fascists. As I have minimal respect for these groups perhaps I should be pro Israel????

    What do you think?

  • Favourite Books I have read lately

    I lover readiong but find it hard nowdays to read fiction (could be an age thing. The best 4 books I have read over the last few months are

    1) Freakeconomics: very witty, wise and revealing
    2) The Islamist by Ed Hussein: Frightening but absorbing I have worked in Newham College adn remeber the stabbing as well as the ISlamisation of Tower Hamlets College. Explains how we have got in this mess
    3) Donnie Brascoe: Just a really good read
    4) The Biography of Gordon Ramsey: Yes he is an arrogent arsehole but read the book to see how to survive the ultimate dysfunctional family

    I have tried reading fiction but for the past 5 years or so just read the end and then dont bother. I like biographies, history books and most political books (with the big P)

  • Pay tax and be hated. The Guardianistas Stalinist Tendancy

    I am a media whore in that I read the Guardian and the Telegraph to get two contrasting takes on life and the Telegraph had an interesting article on the ‘coping classes’. These are the people who pay tax, consume minimal state services, support their children’s hobbies and have strong aspirations for themselves and their offspring. I thought it was a much better term than the oft used middle class as that can mean anything.

    The thrust of the article was that the battle for Nu Labours deputy leadership is all about appearing who can be the most left wing (if you saw Newsnight you will know what they mean) but it is the coping classes who decide elections and keep the country afloat, yet receive the most hatred from the liberal chattering classes. This is what I have been thinking for a long time but it was nice to see it expressed succinctly and it reminds me of the Stalinist times in the Soviet Union, when anyone with a middle class background was sentenced to a longer prison term than someone with a working class background and people would go to great lengths to pretend they had a workers or peasant backgrounds.

    Why the liberal Guardianistas hate the coping classes baffles me, as they pay the tax to allow the army of social workers, community workers, racial equality workers and thought police to exist. All state wealth is the result of tax of some sort and yet we are meant to hate the tax payer and love the tax consumer. If the coping classes consumed state resources in the proportion of the underclass the country would be poorer than Albania.

    I am sure that would not disappoint the Guardianistas though, as long as we were equally poor and hungry they would have achieved their dream of equalty i.e. lets bring everyone down and call it tackling disadvantage.

    I wish I was young enough to emigrate as there is no future in Blairs PC think tank experiment and remember Brown hates the Middle Class even more and wants more of your wealth to spend badly by the state. PFI anyone, Millennium Dome, Olympics, Tax Credits, NHS Computer Systems etc etc etc. As Greg Dyke said last night on question time, if in any walk of life apart from politics the cock ups made by the government would have led to mass sackings.

Footer:

The content of this website belongs to a private person, blog.co.uk is not responsible for the content of this website.